Saturday, January 12, 2013

KLM to cease flights to Iran in April

AMSTERDAM (AP) ? KLM says the company will cancel its flights to Iran as of April, leaving Germany's Lufthansa as the sole Western European-based carrier offering services to Tehran.

Turkish Airlines, which has its headquarters in Istanbul on the European side of The Bosphorus, also flies to Iran.

Spokesman Joost Ruempol of KLM, a subsidiary of Air France-KLM, said Saturday the decision to end the Amsterdam-Tehran route was made for economic, not political reasons.

KLM will continue selling tickets until the end of March.

As part of a review of routes, KLM is also halting service to Addis Ababa in Ethiopia and Khartoum, Sudan.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/klm-cease-flights-iran-april-132109491--finance.html

daylight saving time 2012 grapes of wrath silent house nfl mock draft project m rubio colts

Metals - Regional - Copper slips to US$3.661/lb on Chinese inflation data

By Greta Bourke?/?Business News Americas

Copper closed Friday at US$3.661/lb cash on the London Metal Exchange, down from the previous day's US$3.682/lb as a rise in Chinese inflation data un...

...

This news article is one of hundreds published daily by Business News Americas about the commodities, markets, movements, companies, projects, economics and politics integral to the development of Latin America. Including news and insight from South America, Central America and the Caribbean, BNamericas includes metals insight and forecasts for business opportunities in Latin America. The business development service focuses on major projects, active companies, such as Comisi?n Chilena del Cobre; and business and sales contacts, providing networking opportunities with leading executives throughout Latin America.

Source: http://member.bnamericas.com/news/metals/copper-slips-to-us3661-lb-on-chinese-inflation-data

earthquake today earthquake today Romney Bosses Day 2012 Arlen Specter Winsor McCay Amanda Todd

Friday, January 11, 2013

New York Times Dismantles Its Environment Desk | InsideClimate ...

The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk.

"It wasn't a decision we made lightly," said Dean Baquet, the paper's managing editor for news operations. "To both me and Jill [Abramson, executive editor], coverage of the environment is what separates the New York Times from other papers. We devote a lot of resources to it, now more than ever. We have not lost any desire for environmental coverage. This is purely a structural matter."

On Dec. 3 the Times announced that it was offering buyouts to 30 newsroom managers in an effort to reduce newsroom expenses. But Baquet said the decision to dismantle the environment desk wasn't linked to budgetary concerns and that no one is expected to lose his or her job.

Instead, Baquet said the change was prompted by the shifting interdisciplinary landscape of news reporting. When the desk was created in early 2009, the environmental beat was largely seen as "singular and isolated," he said. It was pre-fracking and pre-economic collapse. But today, environmental stories are "partly business, economic, national or local, among other subjects," Baquet said. "They are more complex. We need to have people working on the different desks that can cover different parts of the story."

The environmental reporters were told of the decision on Wednesday. Baquet said he will meet with each of them to discuss their next assignments and the future of their beats. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, the online site for the Times' daily coverage of energy and environment news.

The paper did a similar restructuring of its education desk a few months ago. Baquet said editors are also considering whether religion reporting could benefit from this type of change.

News that the New York Times is closing its environmental desk comes just a week after The Daily Climate reported that worldwide coverage of climate change continued a three-year slide in 2012?and that among the five largest U.S. dailies, the Times published the most stories and had the biggest increase in coverage. Times assistant managing editor Glenn Kramon told The Daily Climate that "climate change is one of the few subjects so important that we need to be oblivious to cycles and just cover it as hard as we can all the time."

"I ask myself, 'In 20 years, what will we be proudest that we addressed, and where will we scratch our head and say why didn't we focus more on that?'" Kramon said.

On Thursday, Kramon responded to questions from InsideClimate News in an email. "Fortunately, we still have those reporters who cover climate change so well, and we expect to cover the subject just as aggressively going forward," he said.

Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, said that while solid environmental coverage doesn't always require a dedicated team, the Times' decision is "worrying."

"Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues," she said. "It's always a huge loss to see them dismantled ... It's not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next."

Source: http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130111/new-york-times-dismantles-environmental-desk-journalism-fracking-climate-change-science-global-warming-economy

anna paquin warren buffett 2012 nfl schedule dishonored april 18 delonte west vanessa williams

Frances vows help after Mali Islamists take town

BAMAKO, Mali (AP) ? France's president is vowing to help stop the advance of radical Islamists a day after they seized a key town.

The United Nations Security Council also has condemned the capture of Konna, and called on U.N. member states to provide assistance to Mali.

A regional military intervention to take back northern Mali from the Islamists is not likely before September, say diplomats, though the recent advance by the Islamists raises the specter of earlier military action.

France did not specify what assistance it was prepared to offer, though French President Francois Hollande said the former colonial power is ready to help to the stop the Islamist extremists.

The fighting over the town of Konna was the first direct clash between Malian government forces and the Islamists in nearly a year.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/frances-vows-help-mali-islamists-town-121826776.html

brooke burke Alexa Vega Bram Stoker books Paula Broadwell Photos Veterans Day 2012 Nate Silver stock market

The Canada-China investment treaty sleight of hand : Beware Canadians

Howard Mann, Published: Wednesday, 01/09/2013 12:00 am EST
Since 2005, Canada has prided itself on selling an advanced model of investment
treaty to developing countries-one that, it has argued, protects their regulatory space
while still protecting investors.
Indeed, at a UN-sponsored meeting in 2009, Canada carefully explained how its new
model both protected investors and protected governments regulatory and policy
space.
The Canada-China Investment Treaty ends this model, and Canada's negotiating
partners should beware, as should Canadians.
On Jan. 1, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement came into force. Its
language was of its time, and it has spawned some 33 international arbitrations
against Canada. And this number continues to grow, including one initiated last
month over Quebec's decision to suspend natural gas fracking pending further
environmental study, and a further case now being threatened by big pharma if patent
litigation does not go its way.
Canada has similar investment treaties with 25 other nations; an additional 20 will be
ratified or negotiated in the coming years. Canada has not had a claim against it
under these other treaties-but Canadian companies have initiated significant claims
against developing countries, including for over $1 billion.
Arbitrators determine the outcome of claims by looking at the scope of the rights the
treaties give to foreign investors. With awards in investor-state arbitrations now
reaching over $2 billion, the language in these treaties matters. The higher the level
of investor protection, the higher the risk that new laws or regulations will be found
to breach the treaty, requiring compensation to be paid by governments.
In response to the initial arbitrations against Canada, the US, and Mexico under
NAFTA, Canada adopted a new model treaty in 2004 that updated this language. The
revised language restricted the scope of investor rights, without eliminating them-and
reduced the risk of Canada having to pay foreign investors when such measures are
adopted.
To protect these changes in investor protections, post-2004 treaties also include a
technical legal device called a forward-looking most-favoured nation provision. This
means that an investor can use higher levels of investor rights provided under another
treaty, but only if that other treaty was concluded after their nation's initial treaty with
Canada. An investor arbitrating a claim under treaty A can use stronger rights given
to another investor under treaty B, but only if that treaty was concluded later.
Allowing an investor to use an older treaty with broader investor rights under the
provision would undo the risk-reduction strategy by also making the old language
available to investors.
The Canada-China treaty puts an end to this approach. Article 8(1) contains the MFN
provision. It states that the provision does not apply to "treatment accorded under any
bilateral or multilateral international agreement in force prior to 1 January 1994."
This means it does apply to all investment agreements concluded after. So, the MFN
provision is now backward-looking instead of forward-looking.
Between 1994 and 2004, Canada concluded investment treaties with Barbados,
Egypt, Costa Rica, and Ecuador, among others, that contain the older versions of the
investor rights that were discarded by the 2004 model text.
As a result, Chinese investors using the arbitration provisions to sue Canada will
have a claim to use this older language-the same language that even our current
government did not use in treaties it negotiated between 2004 and 2011 because of
the risk it created for all Canadian governments.
This should concern Canadians concerned with issues such as the environmental
conditions on oil sands development.
With Canada now negotiating an EU investment agreement, these higher standards of
investor protection and higher risks to legitimate government measures are being
brought back into the negotiation. EU investors and governments will clearly demand
the same deal as provided to the Chinese.
Why the Canadian government has done this is unknown. To secure higher rights for
Canadian investors abroad by using this new MFN clause? To create a precedent for
negotiations with African countries? To put a brake on future environmental
regulation in Canada, especially in relation to the northern pipeline and China's
newly-acquired tar sands interests? No one knows.
But African governments should beware. Canada is aggressively seeking to negotiate
investment treaties in Africa, especially in mining countries, apparently even tying
development assistance to signing such an agreement in many cases. The government
advertises its treaties as containing well-balanced new standards. But this sleight of
hand in the MFN provision undoes that for African countries too, almost all of which
have old-model treaties as well.
If Canada demands this same MFN provision of countries such as Mali or Benin or
Pakistan or other governments it is negotiating with, Canada will be tying their hands
to provisions that limit their ability to adopt badly-needed new regulatory measures
to protect the environment, worker safety, human health, etc.
African governments should beware of this sleight of hand. Like a magician, Canada
can now sell new-style treaties and make them disappear all at the same time.
Howard Mann is the senior international law advisor for the International Institute
for Sustainable Development, specializing in international law and sustainable
development. The views expressed are his own views and do not necessarily reflect
the views of IISD.
editor@embassynews.ca

http://www.embassynews.ca/opinion/2013/01/08/the-canada-china-investment...
-sleight-of-hand/43048

Source: http://atlantic.sierraclub.ca/en/node/5734

mta schedule PECO Hurricane Sandy update mta ellen degeneres tomb of the unknown soldier tomb of the unknown soldier

raw food, fitness training, ebooks, banana diet, cleanse , detox ...

peelskiAWWW Love your PEELS Schmexies!

Are you in the habit of eating the fruits and just throwing out its peels? It?s time to change this habit then. You should eat fruit peel along with the fruit as it will provide you with a lot of nutrition. They might not be tasty, but you can always try to have them as they will benefit you a lot. Just keep one thing in mind before you have a fruit peel. You have to wash the fruits thoroughly before consuming them.

So Schmexies, what peels can you eat? Only organic ones for a starter, here are some fruits that Should include ingesting the peel!

Mango Skin- My fav!! and some call the The king of all fruits has many nutritional benefits hidden not only in the pulp but also in the skin. It cures many diseases like diabetes. It also reduces the chances of cancer. This fruit peel has an element called resveratrol that lowers blood cholesterol levels. So you may opt to have at least one slice of mango with a peel everyday to reap its benefits.

Apple Skin- Many people peel the apple before they eat it. But there is no reason to do that with ORGANIC FRUIT. It is soft enough, easy to digest and has many health benefits. Apple fruit peel is a good source of calcium and vitamin A. They are also a rich source of dietary fibres that are very important to keep the bowel movement clean. Being a rich source of antioxidants it keeps us safe from free radicals that damage our cells and lead to many diseases like cardiovascular problems and diabetes. It?s always better to eat such fruits along with the peel.

Lemon Peel- This fruit peel is an excellent means to improve digestion. It also reduces stomach cramps and lemon can improve the blood circulation of the entire bodies systems and boost the immune system.

Orange Peel- An orange peel is rich in phytonutrients and flavonoids. It helps in digestion. It also lowers the cholesterol levels and significantly reduces the chances of cancer.

Kiwi- Kiwi skin provides so many yummy vitamins, minerals and antioxidants. Perfect for promoting optimal cardiovascular health by acting as a natural blood thinner.

Source: http://sexyrawfoodandfitness.com/healthy-living/fruit-a-peel/

cinco de mayo osama bin laden death spinal muscular atrophy brooklyn nets may day protests tony nominations 2012 facebook organ donor

Google to help setup free WiFi blanket in NYC's Southwest Chelsea neighborhood

While Google's offered free WiFi access in NYC subways from time to time, it's apparently now set to help get a permanent solution live in a Manhattan neighborhood. There are no details regarding a time-frame, but the company's linked up with the Chelsea Improvement Company to provide the access to Southwest Chelsea. Aside from the perks of pro bono interwebs for all, the initiative will serve to provide internet to likes of low-income and student housing in the locale -- though, it seems a natural undertaking given Google's office in the area. At the very least, it's another nice chip toward municipal WiFi in the Big Apple. Full presser after the break.

Continue reading Google to help setup free WiFi blanket in NYC's Southwest Chelsea neighborhood

Filed under: ,

Comments

Via: Yahoo! News, BGR

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/09/google-free-wifi-southwest-chelsea-nyc/

Clint Eastwood speech Maria Montessori clint eastwood Julian Castro Blue Moon August 2012 Eddie Murphy Dead michelle obama